<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Sheseo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sheseo.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sheseo.com</link>
	<description>Giving Google the SEO she wants!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 08:14:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why You Should Use Pinterest by SY (aka Hospitalera)</title>
		<link>http://sheseo.com/why-you-should-use-pinterest/#comment-6230</link>
		<dc:creator>SY (aka Hospitalera)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 08:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hospitalera.com/?p=1602#comment-6230</guid>
		<description>Sure Natty, on its way ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure Natty, on its way <img src='http://sheseo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Seems SBI and Ken Evoy are on the Google War Path by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://sheseo.com/sbi-ken-evoy-are-on-the-google-war-path/#comment-6224</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hospitalera.com/?p=1528#comment-6224</guid>
		<description>Something else anyone considering SBI should know is that Ken and Team have no problem exposing your site stats in the forums. 

If you mention your stats in any way make sure you are accurate. If not and it reflects negatively on SBI, you will be scolded and your &quot;corrected&quot; stats will be offered up in the forums. Like-- We checked and you only dropped %18 yesterday, not the %20 you claimed, and compared to what your site did this same day last year that&#039;s actually an improvement of xyz percentage.--

So be warned. Even mentioning your stats in passing indicates to them that they can discuss even more about your site statistics than you might be comfortable with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something else anyone considering SBI should know is that Ken and Team have no problem exposing your site stats in the forums. </p>
<p>If you mention your stats in any way make sure you are accurate. If not and it reflects negatively on SBI, you will be scolded and your &#8220;corrected&#8221; stats will be offered up in the forums. Like&#8211; We checked and you only dropped %18 yesterday, not the %20 you claimed, and compared to what your site did this same day last year that&#8217;s actually an improvement of xyz percentage.&#8211;</p>
<p>So be warned. Even mentioning your stats in passing indicates to them that they can discuss even more about your site statistics than you might be comfortable with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why You Should Use Pinterest by Natty</title>
		<link>http://sheseo.com/why-you-should-use-pinterest/#comment-6223</link>
		<dc:creator>Natty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hospitalera.com/?p=1602#comment-6223</guid>
		<description>Nice article! I would love to give it a try, could you please send me an invite? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article! I would love to give it a try, could you please send me an invite? <img src='http://sheseo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ms Google – We need a reverse nofollow tag like in &#8212; NOW! by Ashley Lane</title>
		<link>http://sheseo.com/ms-google-reverse-nofollow-tag/#comment-6219</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheseo.com/?p=1945#comment-6219</guid>
		<description>Great post!

Google disclaims in several places that it cannot control spam in its search results (Which IT controls) but it expects webmasters to control links and content on OTHER people&#039;s sites?

Google has more control over their content than webmasters do!

It all makes no sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!</p>
<p>Google disclaims in several places that it cannot control spam in its search results (Which IT controls) but it expects webmasters to control links and content on OTHER people&#8217;s sites?</p>
<p>Google has more control over their content than webmasters do!</p>
<p>It all makes no sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ms Google – We need a reverse nofollow tag like in &#8212; NOW! by SY (aka Hospitalera)</title>
		<link>http://sheseo.com/ms-google-reverse-nofollow-tag/#comment-6217</link>
		<dc:creator>SY (aka Hospitalera)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 09:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheseo.com/?p=1945#comment-6217</guid>
		<description>No, it doesn&#039;t exist and I seriously doubt that Google will ever provide - sadly ;-( SY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it doesn&#8217;t exist and I seriously doubt that Google will ever provide &#8211; sadly ;-( SY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ms Google – We need a reverse nofollow tag like in &#8212; NOW! by Pip</title>
		<link>http://sheseo.com/ms-google-reverse-nofollow-tag/#comment-6216</link>
		<dc:creator>Pip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 08:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheseo.com/?p=1945#comment-6216</guid>
		<description>So, this service which webmasters could sign up to doesn&#039;t exist yet right? WHY? It is such a good idea and yeah it may be tedious but y&#039;know what? You have to work hard to get anywhere in life! Great post SHESEO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, this service which webmasters could sign up to doesn&#8217;t exist yet right? WHY? It is such a good idea and yeah it may be tedious but y&#8217;know what? You have to work hard to get anywhere in life! Great post SHESEO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ms Google – We need a reverse nofollow tag like in &#8212; NOW! by SY (aka Hospitalera)</title>
		<link>http://sheseo.com/ms-google-reverse-nofollow-tag/#comment-6215</link>
		<dc:creator>SY (aka Hospitalera)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 07:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheseo.com/?p=1945#comment-6215</guid>
		<description>Hi Gab,

Yes, a lot of people think that PPC is a major driving force behind this latest update, I am not so sure about that point. I also see your point that when &#039;hammered&#039; with negative SEO going one by one through them might be a tiny bit tedious, but still, I think preferable to the current situation where a webmaster can do nothing about it. Google can&#039;t ignore links, there is really no replacement for this part of the algo in my opinion, social signals like Twitter, G+ etc are not really able to replace this for various reasons. One thing Google could do is to ignore links that don&#039;t carry any traffic over to the linked site or at least to value such a link much less. And yes, Google certainly doesn&#039;t care what we want, but it might care a tiny bit more about what the search engine users and Adwords buyers want, hopefully ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gab,</p>
<p>Yes, a lot of people think that PPC is a major driving force behind this latest update, I am not so sure about that point. I also see your point that when &#8216;hammered&#8217; with negative SEO going one by one through them might be a tiny bit tedious, but still, I think preferable to the current situation where a webmaster can do nothing about it. Google can&#8217;t ignore links, there is really no replacement for this part of the algo in my opinion, social signals like Twitter, G+ etc are not really able to replace this for various reasons. One thing Google could do is to ignore links that don&#8217;t carry any traffic over to the linked site or at least to value such a link much less. And yes, Google certainly doesn&#8217;t care what we want, but it might care a tiny bit more about what the search engine users and Adwords buyers want, hopefully &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ms Google – We need a reverse nofollow tag like in &#8212; NOW! by Gab</title>
		<link>http://sheseo.com/ms-google-reverse-nofollow-tag/#comment-6211</link>
		<dc:creator>Gab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 23:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheseo.com/?p=1945#comment-6211</guid>
		<description>Although I love the idea, it seems clear that google can&#039;t care less.... isn&#039;t all this a PPC long term strategy.
Ignoring specific domain names is an OK idea, but let see, the negative SEO company can generate 10K backlinks in one day.
How will this work for the real business owner?
Start blocking one by one...?

The easiest way will be : Ignore links. 
Simple. No penalty. No drama.

But obviously Google doesn&#039;t care about what we want....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I love the idea, it seems clear that google can&#8217;t care less&#8230;. isn&#8217;t all this a PPC long term strategy.<br />
Ignoring specific domain names is an OK idea, but let see, the negative SEO company can generate 10K backlinks in one day.<br />
How will this work for the real business owner?<br />
Start blocking one by one&#8230;?</p>
<p>The easiest way will be : Ignore links.<br />
Simple. No penalty. No drama.</p>
<p>But obviously Google doesn&#8217;t care about what we want&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ms Google – We need a reverse nofollow tag like in &#8212; NOW! by In Wake Of Penguin, Could You Be Sued For Linking To Others?</title>
		<link>http://sheseo.com/ms-google-reverse-nofollow-tag/#comment-6200</link>
		<dc:creator>In Wake Of Penguin, Could You Be Sued For Linking To Others?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 13:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheseo.com/?p=1945#comment-6200</guid>
		<description>[...] warnings sent from Google.  The only current way to discredit a link is to have it removed as reverse nofollow functionality for webmasters simply doesn&#8217;t exist.  One recent example of a link [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] warnings sent from Google.  The only current way to discredit a link is to have it removed as reverse nofollow functionality for webmasters simply doesn&#8217;t exist.  One recent example of a link [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ms Google – We need a reverse nofollow tag like in &#8212; NOW! by The Horrible Consequence of Penguin &#8211; DMCA Takedowns</title>
		<link>http://sheseo.com/ms-google-reverse-nofollow-tag/#comment-6195</link>
		<dc:creator>The Horrible Consequence of Penguin &#8211; DMCA Takedowns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 17:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheseo.com/?p=1945#comment-6195</guid>
		<description>[...] could easily fix this As Sheseo pointed out, Google needs to come up with a way that webmasters can reverse no-follow bad links pointed at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] could easily fix this As Sheseo pointed out, Google needs to come up with a way that webmasters can reverse no-follow bad links pointed at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

